Montgomery County (Md.) district seeks $2.7 billion to address facility needs

The district's request to the county government falls short of the $5.15 billion it requires for all its facility needs.
Oct. 15, 2025
2 min read

Key Highlights

  • The $2.7 billion the district has requested is significantly less than the $5.15 billion required to address all facility needs.
  • Past approaches of postponing projects and small fixes have contributed to the worsening state of school infrastructure.
  • New strategies include using data to prioritize projects, rebuilding schools instead of adding onto existing structures, and focusing on modest, sustainable improvements.

The Montgomery County (Maryland) school district plans to ask the county for $2.7 billion to address facility needs as part of its six-year capital improvements program.

Bethesda Today reports that the $2.7 billion proposal is about $2.5 billion less than the $5.15 billion the district needs to address all of its facility needs, Montgomery County Superintendent Thomas Taylor says.

“We have a lot of infrastructure work that has been left and been ignored … . It took us two decades to get into this mess,” Taylor says. “It is going to take us two decades to get out of this mess.”  

Taylor says the proposal reflects several new strategies to address infrastructure needs. Those include using data to prioritize projects, growing investments over time, building more “modest” school buildings and rebuilding schools when needed instead of planning partial projects.

Many school communities have long complained about issues within buildings, including dead mice and crumbling auditorium ceilings at Col. Zadok Magruder High School in Rockville, extreme temperatures and mold at A. Mario Loiederman Middle School in Silver Spring, continuous delayed construction projects at Silver Spring International Middle and Highland View Elementary School in Silver Spring, and pests, mold and air quality concerns in the Carver Educational Services Center (CESC) in Rockville.

“Our facility condition is, in fact, declining,” Taylor says. “The sad part about this [is] it’s just not declining, but it’s getting worse and worse and worse every year, because the gap in resources we have to fill is continuing to widen each year.”    

Taylor said the district has employed a strategy that includes postponing projects, “sprinkling” some short-term “fixes” or small renovations among schools instead of replacing them and reducing investment in capital projects over the past several years.   

Instead, the superintendent suggested new strategies such as growing investments over time, rebuilding schools instead of adding on to them, prioritizing projects based on data,  and creating more modest school buildings.  

About the Author

Mike Kennedy

Senior Editor

Mike Kennedy has been writing about education for American School & University since 1999. He also has reported on schools and other topics for The Chicago Tribune, The Kansas City Star, The Kansas City Times and City News Bureau of Chicago. He is a graduate of Michigan State University.

Sign up for American School & University Newsletters
Get the latest news and updates.